tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2794509057609336692.post6818653764520915891..comments2023-10-21T09:08:31.759-07:00Comments on The Storytellers: The World Must Be PeopledGuy Hassonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04528759718173536747noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2794509057609336692.post-73439800003314693932008-03-02T15:32:00.000-08:002008-03-02T15:32:00.000-08:00Hey, Zia. Welcome to the site.Listen, after you tr...Hey, Zia. Welcome to the site.<BR/><BR/>Listen, after you try this out on some men you know, tell me how it went, okay?<BR/><BR/>In answer to your question about how I 'know' this to be true. I don't know anything, of course. It's what I think, based on whatever information life has offered me so far. There's nothing scientific or failsafe or certain about it. This site is here to make people think, not to get them to agree.<BR/><BR/>Tell us how it went.Guy Hassonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04528759718173536747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2794509057609336692.post-10323067121616839532008-03-01T23:08:00.000-08:002008-03-01T23:08:00.000-08:00I really am fascinated by your theory, but I was w...I really am fascinated by your theory, but I was wondering HOW you knew that 'most' men react to the movie in the same way you did? I would like you to be right, but I just can't buy that most men think this way. Its not disbelief, I'd just like proof. <BR/><BR/><BR/>I'm going to try and test out this theory on men I know...(I don't know how... make them watch Switch, put my fingers on their wrist perhaps.)<BR/><BR/>You have interesting ideas, especially when you refer to an author's tools. Like this site. <BR/>ZiaSShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15810266635725632966noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2794509057609336692.post-26369422875702141582007-11-22T02:13:00.000-08:002007-11-22T02:13:00.000-08:00Two things, ZZ.One: The words 'all' or 'whole' wer...Two things, ZZ.<BR/><BR/>One: The words 'all' or 'whole' were never used in that context, and that's the way I meant it to be. You <I>will</I> find the word 'most' somewhere in the article. Talking about everyone never works. That's the reason I can't say that all men are attracted to women or that the sky is always blue or that all men are stupid. That's because some men are not attracted to women, the sky is not always blue, and some men are not stupid. Since I wasn't trying to analyze "the whole male race", nor did it say that anywhere in the article, I can only assume it was convenient for you to think I was doing that.<BR/><BR/>Two: Is that really the domino that toppled everything else I said? Does that really mean that everything else I said is without merit?Guy Hassonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04528759718173536747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2794509057609336692.post-90864870801051495412007-11-20T12:37:00.000-08:002007-11-20T12:37:00.000-08:00"People who would be actively against abortion bec..."People who would be actively against abortion because they care so much for life and for the sacredness of it would be out there helping the poor and the hungry in all countries"<BR/><BR/>Ummm, they are. Why do you selectively ignore the jillions of Christian releif agencies doing just this?<BR/><BR/>"they would be against the death penalty"<BR/><BR/>No, the anti-abortion position is not foremost about life, it's about JUSTICE. Yes, a little baby has more right to life than a serial killer.<BR/><BR/>"would be just as active against the many genocides and slaughters"<BR/><BR/>Again, they are, as a group. But you can't expect every individual who self-identifies as a Christian to go out and martyr himself in Darfur. You have to work where you're put.<BR/><BR/>Sorry, your attempt to psychoanalyze the whole male race has failed. Sloppy, sloppy thinking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com